.


the group

  • Andrea Cousens
  • Barbara Bates
  • Becky Quinlan
  • Elaine Cummings
  • Joel Postman
  • Juan de León
  • Katie Hallen
  • Mimi Harris
  • Rachel Lepold
  • Rachel Shelton
  • Stuart Froman

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

feeds

*


**


« Another SaaS Salvo | Main | 3 Wikis: #2 -- The Autism Spectrum Wiki »

33 Wikis: #1 -- Wikilaw

33wikis_2 This is the first installment in "33 Wikis," a close look at best practices in wiki-based collaboration.  Each day -- for 33 days -- we look at one wiki and briefly describe what the wiki is for, why we like it, and what we can all learn from it.  If you want to nominate a wiki, please let us know.  On day 34 we will post a public wiki featuring info on all nominees.

Thanks to Jeff Nolan for nominating the first wiki in this series, Wikilaw, which describes itself as follows:

Wikilaw's goal is to build the largest open-content legal resource in the world. To accomplish this goal, Wikilaw needs your help! We encourage all law professors, practitioners, and students to share their knowledge. Currently, there are roughly 1,000,000 lawyers in the United States. If every lawyer in America contributed a fraction of their legal knowledge to this site, Wikilaw would become one of the largest libraries of legal information in the world.

What this wiki is for:  this is an example of large-group collaboration, in which participants can tap the "wisdom of crowds" to get quality information at no cost.  The fact that this experiment is happening in a market where there are commercial alternatives makes Wikilaw a lot like Wikipedia.  In fact, we can think of it as a Wikipedia for law, for practitioners and laypeople alike.

We we like it:  In a past life, I worked in the law and public policy, so personally I am thrilled to see a resource like this.  But we also like it because the scale of its ambition.  In addition to the legal reference portions of this site, there is a project called Democracy 2.0 that aims to develop consensus on law and legal principles, outside of any institutional structure.  This is an interesting example of the kind of ad hoc political organization that we expect to see more of in the next few years.

What we can all learn from it:  this is a new experiment in the making, but the Wikipedia-like approach might encourage other professions to attempt similar projects.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83420a56953ef00d83481e6a953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 33 Wikis: #1 -- Wikilaw:

Comments

we've done a fair bit of research on wikiness in the last 2 months over at educationbridges (http://educationbridges.org) I've also written a fair bit of policy stuff associated with wikis on my blog. If you're interested, perhaps we could have a skype chat on the subject. (id coarsesalt) We have a list of good wikis someplace, i'll send it when i find it... cheers.

I think this is a great idea. We have a daughter with Asperger's Disorder and the lack of understanding amongst professionals in society is quite daunting. I am talking about medical and teaching professionals not to mention counsellors. Something like this will give people like me a greater understanding of how to deal better with my daughter. Thank you.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.